Skip to main content

Work Management use case

Compliance and audit evidence workflow software

Compliance and audit workflows send access reviews, evidence requests and policy attestations to the right owners on a schedule, chase them until they're done, and record every decision. Kinetic pulls current access from Okta, Active Directory and your applications, so reviewers judge real data, and removals they approve run automatically.

Reads real access from Okta, Active Directory and Entra ID, compared with Workday, before any reviewer sees a list.

How reviews and evidence requests run on schedule

  1. Experience layer

    A task list for each control owner and reviewer showing what is assigned to them, what it's for and when it's due.

  2. Workflow layer

    Reviews and evidence requests go out on a schedule, collect decisions and system data, send reminders before deadlines, escalate overdue items and run approved removals.

  3. Integration layer

    Pulls current access from Okta, Active Directory and Entra ID, compares it with Workday, stores evidence in SharePoint and writes completed reviews and findings back to Archer or your GRC tool.

    • Okta
    • Active Directory
    • Microsoft Entra ID
    • Workday
    • ServiceNow
    • SharePoint
    • Archer

AI in compliance and audit workflows

AI gathers and summarizes evidence and highlights access that looks out of policy. Keep-or-remove decisions and acceptance of evidence belong to reviewers and auditors.

What AI does

  • Collects and summarizes evidence for each control
  • Flags access that looks out of policy during reviews
  • Drafts reminders and status summaries for the audit lead

Decided by people, not by AI

  • Keep-or-remove decisions in each access review
  • Acceptance of evidence for each control
  • Exceptions and remediation plans

Six weeks before the auditors arrive

The compliance analyst has a list of controls and a deadline. For the access control family she needs proof that quarterly reviews happened, that terminated employees lost access within policy, and that exceptions were approved. The proof is spread across Okta exports, Workday termination reports, ServiceNow tickets and a folder of manager emails that say “looks fine.”

She spends weeks stitching it together, and the result shows what the organization did months ago, not what it does now. Reviews happen quarterly because doing them more often by hand would be impossible. Between reviews, access drifts.

Reviews that run themselves

On the schedule you set, quarterly for most systems and monthly for the sensitive ones, Kinetic:

  1. Pulls current access from Okta, Active Directory and the connected applications and compares it with Workday. Accounts belonging to people who left, access that doesn’t match the current role and contractor access past its end date are flagged before a reviewer sees anything.
  2. Sends each manager a list of their people and what each person can reach, with the flags on top. They mark keep or remove.
  3. Reminds them before the deadline and escalates to their manager after it.
  4. Runs every “remove” through the same deprovisioning workflow used at offboarding, and records the result.
  5. Writes the completed review and any open findings back to Archer or your GRC platform.

Policy attestations and evidence requests work the same way: assigned to an owner, due on a date, chased until done, and stored with who did what and when.

Evidence as a byproduct

The bigger change is upstream. When access requests, offboarding and change approvals already run through Kinetic, each one leaves a timestamped record of the request, the approver and the change made in each system. Frameworks such as NIST 800-53, CMMC, SOX and HIPAA ask for exactly that kind of evidence. Audit preparation becomes a filtered export of records that already exist.

Kinetic doesn’t decide whether a control passes. People still review the evidence, and your auditors still form their opinion. What changes is how much of their time goes to finding things.

Most teams connect this to access request automation first, since that is where review findings come from, and then to cyber security and risk management workflows.

Questions about compliance and audit workflows

Answered by Kinetic Data. Last updated .

  • Can Kinetic run quarterly access reviews?

    Yes. Kinetic pulls current access from identity and application systems, sends each reviewer their list on a schedule, and records each keep or remove decision. Removals then run through the same workflow used for offboarding.

  • Does Kinetic make us compliant with NIST 800-53, CMMC or SOX?

    No software does that on its own. Kinetic runs the recurring activities those frameworks expect, such as access reviews, attestations and evidence collection, and keeps a timestamped record of each one. Your GRC tool and your auditors still decide whether a control is met.

  • Do we have to replace Archer or our GRC platform?

    No. The GRC platform stays the record of controls and findings. Kinetic does the collection and chasing behind it and writes completed reviews and open findings back to it.

  • How often can access reviews run?

    As often as you set. Most teams keep quarterly reviews for most systems and run monthly reviews for privileged and sensitive access, which is practical once the data pulls and reminders run on their own.

Bring one process. Leave with a plan to build it.

Two hours with our team, at no cost. Bring one process that crosses your systems. We map it with you, show what Kinetic would build, and send you a written plan afterward.